Mar 30, 2008, 03:40 PM // 15:40
|
#1
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: [Disc]
Profession: W/
|
Question About Talents O_O
I was wondering if talents existed. I mean how would you receive them? Through your genes? Or is it what you have learned so far in your life, and combining them into knowledge to study something else, and you find that you are really good in it.
Just curious O_O.
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2008, 05:31 PM // 17:31
|
#2
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Dec 2005
Guild: Galactic President Superstar Mc [awsm]
Profession: E/
|
I guess it's a good combination of genes and body structure. Combine that with something you like and thus practice it and learn it more quickly: talent.
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2008, 07:23 PM // 19:23
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Profession: Me/
|
Talent is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2008, 07:30 PM // 19:30
|
#4
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: British Columbia
Profession: W/
|
OP answered own question in own post..
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2008, 09:57 PM // 21:57
|
#5
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Inkland
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorondor Port
OP answered own question in own post..
|
Thats a very useful talent to have. I wonder if it is genetic
Most talent is arguably from genetics or they just work hard when you are not looking, then make like they haven't done anything at all.
|
|
|
Mar 31, 2008, 03:57 PM // 15:57
|
#6
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: [Disc]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial_Kitsune
Talent is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.
|
Your avatar kinda makes this scary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poobert
Most talent is arguably from genetics or they just work hard when you are not looking, then make like they haven't done anything at all.
|
So does that mean the hours I've spent PvPing were suppose to make me better? Cause I still suck!
|
|
|
Apr 01, 2008, 03:12 AM // 03:12
|
#7
|
are we there yet?
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in a land far far away
Guild: guild? I am supposed to have a guild?
Profession: Rt/
|
part is from mom and dad (or in my case grandpa and mom) part just IS....
case in point, I am a great baker as was my grandpa not my mom, well if its not cookies she wasnt very good at it (no offence)....I also got some art talent from her...as well as musical ability.
I know of others who have talents that they cant figure out---like great musicians without a single person in the family able to carry a tune (without an ipod)....
so some is family and some just IS.
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2008, 06:06 AM // 06:06
|
#8
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: [Disc]
Profession: W/
|
Basically, some comes from your genes while other talents are self developed through your childhood, things that affected you, etc.
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 12:09 PM // 12:09
|
#9
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Sep 2007
Guild: They May Be Dead [DEAD]
Profession: N/
|
Redbull and Jagermeister.
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 02:28 PM // 14:28
|
#10
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial_Kitsune
Talent is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.
|
Not always true. You or I could train every bit as hard as a professional footballer and never be a quarter as good.
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 03:24 PM // 15:24
|
#11
|
Emo Goth Italics
|
It's based on many things.
Inspiration, body structure, perseverance (however you spell it), training and yes, genes.
Sometimes you develope things without even noticing. Sometimes you use your own talents when you don't even know you have them. It's based on many, many factors.
This is just what I think, anyway.
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 04:14 PM // 16:14
|
#12
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: May 2005
Guild: none.
Profession: W/
|
I don't believe talent exists. It's merely skill; it may be developed at an early stage, but it's still skill. Notice how people only seem to give praise when somebody is young, or does something "out of the norm" (such as being able to paint or play an instrument extremely well at a young age). These are things which some may consider "talent" (that is, something you're inherently born with), and I strongly disagree.
The problem is that you cannot perceive the difference between so-called "talent" and "skill"; what is the distinction, exactly? Why would you rate somebody's "natural-born skill" (talent) anyway?
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 04:31 PM // 16:31
|
#13
|
Site Legend
|
Life is like GW (or the other way around)
Time>Skill
__________________
Old Skool '05
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 04:38 PM // 16:38
|
#14
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
The nature vs nurture question gets closer to an answer every day but is still not there. The scientists only just finished blueprinting the human genome in 2000, and they started that project officially in 1989. True, they first began looking at the human gene on the microscopic level in the 1970s, but there wasn't an official program until 1989.
So for the time being we only have behavioral studies to deduce assumptions from, and, of course, those are subject to skewing by so many factors.
From my own personal experience, it's hard to tell about visual artistic talent. I'm the only one of four siblings who exhibits any degree of drawing and painting talent; however, all four of us have fashion and color sense, as did our father and his siblings. And our mother clearly didn't have any visual talent, while her mother was talented at drawing and painting. Was it my interest in recreating people, things and places on paper and canvas and my parents' encouragement that nurtured my talent or was it a genetic predisposition that triggered my interest? It's hard to tell.
The Wyeth family is an interesting study in nature vs nurture as well with three generations of successful artists. And I'm not just talking about the usual suspects, N.C., Andrew and Jamie Wyeth. Henrietta Wyeth Hurd and her two sons Peter and Michael Hurd are successful artists as well. N.C. Wyeth nurtured and influenced the two generations succeeding him, but was there a genetic predisposition as well?
In the case of musical talent, however, I believe it's possible to distinguish a stronger nature (genetic) influence on talent than nurture. Young children able to recreate entire musical passages after hearing them only once and coming from a family that didn't emphasize music in the home is very telling.
Good question Jam Jar... but as far as I can tell, there still is no definitive answer. Maybe soon. But when you google for an answer you can see the debate rages still.
That said, I tend to believe that a genetic predisposition toward interest in the area where we develop our particular talent is stronger than the environmental influences.
|
|
|
Apr 05, 2008, 11:59 PM // 23:59
|
#15
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Sep 2007
Guild: They May Be Dead [DEAD]
Profession: N/
|
Not to mention, there are singers today who sing everyday, and still suck at it.
You either have it, or you don't.
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2008, 06:09 AM // 06:09
|
#16
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Guild: Divinity Unleashed
Profession: R/
|
I think talent is just finding something that your naturally good at and that you enjoy doing,
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:12 AM // 09:12.
|